Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:02

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why does a straight man like anal penetration?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Rangers Place Tyler Mahle On 15-Day Injured List, Recall Kumar Rocker - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Democrat announces run against Ernst after her 'We're all going to die' comments - ABC News
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What is your twin flame story?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
End of an Era: Landsat 7 Decommissioned After 25 Years of Earth Observation - USGS (.gov)
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Does the West have a defense against China's PL17 air-air missile?